Well, thanks for putting together an optimistic scenario.
"Governor Scott for the first time is putting money into a statewide media campaign in support of common sense, fiscally responsible candidates who will sustain his vetoes..."
I saw an ad on TV last night he made saying exactly that. Seems rather generic and pat statement...cold comfort. I suggest it would be more effective to name the names of those R's running in the important races you outlined. Maybe do an ad for each county. I would be more apt to remember the names than a general sound bite. But then again, pretty much any R is better than any D -- a pretty low bar in this state. Plus, there is the issue of Dominion vote counters and the lack of transparency and voter registration controls. Close races are easy to win by fraud, and D's have the $$ and almost always challenge outcome of a close race.
Well, thanks for putting together an optimistic scenario.
"Governor Scott for the first time is putting money into a statewide media campaign in support of common sense, fiscally responsible candidates who will sustain his vetoes..."
I saw an ad on TV last night he made saying exactly that. Seems rather generic and pat statement...cold comfort. I suggest it would be more effective to name the names of those R's running in the important races you outlined. Maybe do an ad for each county. I would be more apt to remember the names than a general sound bite. But then again, pretty much any R is better than any D -- a pretty low bar in this state. Plus, there is the issue of Dominion vote counters and the lack of transparency and voter registration controls. Close races are easy to win by fraud, and D's have the $$ and almost always challenge outcome of a close race.
Fully agree
Cough cough Becca White.
Thank you ---- Compelling analysis and admirable optimism