Democrat Supermajority Has No Interest in Solving the Property Tax Mess They Made
They are circling the wagons around politically powerful special interests.
Democrats in the State House were parading around this week with a banner insisting, “If you make a mess, you clean it up!” Yeah! Big talk! They think this should apply to oil companies regarding climate change (another story I’ll get to soon), but apply that message to themselves regarding the colossal property tax tsunami of a mess they’ve made for us? Well, not so much.
As far as property tax relief for Vermonters goes, the banner reads, “If you make a mess, create a ‘task force’ of usual suspects to ‘look into it’, keep the money flowing to your political cronies, and hope the voters have short memories and deep pockets.” Hey, it’s worked in the past! But I’m getting the feeling it’s not going to work as well this time. They’ve been successfully boiling the frog (us) for a long time, but got greedy, turned up the heat too fast, and the taxpayers are ready to jump out of the pot.
Vermonters worried we are about to be taxed out of our homes come July are now being told not to expect any sort of relief for at least three years while they study the issue. News flash: we can’t afford the bill this year! Fix your mess NOW.
Vermont’s current property tax explosion/crisis is driven by the fact that we spend more money per public school student that almost every other state in the Union by a long shot. After this year’s spending spree, we might just be number one. The official “weighted student average” is $23,299, but if you divide the total $2.5 billion education budget by the 80,000 pre-k to 12 kids in the system the number is over $30,000.
This latest $200 million budget gap that is the reason for the 20 percent year over year average property tax (and/or other taxes) increase is primarily the result of over spending on:
The $30 million unfunded mandate to expand the free and reduced meals program for low-income students to universally include free food for the wealthiest kids as well. Yeah, that was dumb and unnecessary.
Poor financial planning that irresponsibly used one-time COVID emergency money for ongoing expenditures. Yeah, that was dumb and avoidable.
Jacking up per-pupil spending with a new weighing system (Act 127). That was just a power/money play to pay off the teachers’ union at the expense of the taxpayer. Repeal it today.
Salaries and benefits resulting from the overstaffing of a system (Vermont has the highest staff to student ratio in the country; more than twice the national average) that has lost roughly 25 percent of its students over the past two decades. Simple bureaucratic bloat.
And general inflation. Thanks, Joe Biden!
What’s the solution? Here’s my proposal:
Short term, cap individuals’ property tax increases to a level no greater than inflation (currently 3.5%). If what that generates plus the other revenue streams to the Education fund (100% of the sales & use tax, 25% of the rooms & meals tax, lottery, etc.) doesn’t cover the cost of school budgets, the delta should be made up through cuts to other programs – unfunded education mandates such as the $30 million free meals programs, or cuts to general fund programs with the revenue shifted to education. I’d suggest starting with all those programs that use taxpayer dollars to subsidize EV purchases, solar panel installations, etc. Those are luxury programs, not basic government services.
No new taxes! We are taxed enough already and taking even more of our money just out of different pockets – as the Democrats are doing -- is not tax relief. It’s making the mess that much bigger.
Long term, restructure the system to first establish an education budget amount and a tax rate Vermonters can afford, and then figure out how to spend that amount in the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve superior student outcomes. Every other state in the Union bar one has figured this out how to spend less on education than we do, and a lot of them are getting better student outcomes to boot. Every independent school in Vermont operates this way, and they get better results for less money. How about we learn from them instead of trying to shut them down.
A big reason we are in this mess is because our lawmakers created a public education financing system in which we throw everything the special interests say they want into the shopping cart, and then tell the taxpayers to pay for whatever the cash register rings up. This dynamic has to end. Unfortunately, it is the dynamic that Democrats in Montpelier, under the influence of the VTNEA, Superintendents Association, and Principals’ Association are doubling down on.
The multi-year study process they are opting for in lieu of meaningful reform is not being set up to control costs and provide property tax relief. It is going to “figure out the policy, vision and the system of where we are going and then how do we fund it….” That’s no different from what we are doing now. It’s the problem. It’s the reason for the mess. Clean it up.
Rob Roper is a freelance writer with 20 years of experience in Vermont politics including three years service as chair of the Vermont Republican Party and nine years as President of the Ethan Allen Institute, Vermont’s free market think tank.
Media Notes: In case you missed my appearance on WVMT’s Morning Drive on Thursday, April 18, you can find the link to the replay HERE.
Social Media: Follow BTL on Facebook, on TwitterX, and on YouTube.
Click that ♡ button, please. And don’t forget to subscribe and share. I’m grateful for your help with growing the BTL audience! Thanks.
Thanks for these kind words from a subscriber! "Rob's tireless work of shining the bright light into the dark corners of the VT political scene is what journalism should be. Love the "Clean Heat Standard" coverage especially. Please keep up the GREAT work!"
The supermajority is acting like they have no accountability for their actions. Because they have no accountability for their actions. If we at least had a real governor there would be vocal opposition that articulates what’s really going on, just as Mr Roper continues to do. Alas we have no such thing.
I'm old enough to remember Jarvis's California tax revolt in California. The result was a law that pegged property tax increases to inflation. 50 yrs later it's still the law.
Taxpayers voted it in via a proposition/referendum. Is there such a mechanism in Vermont?